Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix Face Lawsuit for Deliberately Driving Up RAM Prices

A major federal class-action lawsuit has been filed in California against the world’s three largest memory chip makers - Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Accused of manipulating the market by staging an artificial RAM shortage under the cover of the AI boom, the "Big Three" are under fire as consumer DRAM prices skyrocket.

Three of the world’s biggest memory chip producers, Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, are now facing a federal class-action lawsuit filed in California on June 25, 2026, over allegedly creating an artificial RAM shortage.

The lawsuit, which was filed by frustrated consumers, accuses the aforementioned companies of deliberately restricting RAM supply to push prices higher. Together, these three firms control the vast majority of the global DRAM market.

The lawsuit arrives at a moment when memory prices have reached historic highs. DRAM contract prices rose an estimated 90-95% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 2026 alone.

- Advertisement -

The price hikes have not been limited to DRAM alone. NAND flash prices have also climbed, driving up SSD costs and increasing manufacturing expenses for a wide range of devices, including laptops, smartphones, and gaming consoles.

The complaint alleges that the manufacturers have used the AI boom over the past few years as cover for the artificial price hike.

Plaintiffs claim all three companies began coordinating production cuts in late 2022, reducing output, scaling back investment, and slowing expansion while prioritizing AI data center memory over standard consumer DRAM. Critics argue this was a strategic choice, not simply a market response to demand.

Plaintiffs further note that in a healthy competitive market, rising prices would typically prompt at least one supplier to ramp up output and capture customers, but that didn’t happen here, with all three companies simultaneously pulling back.

Previously, we’ve seen Samsung and SK Hynix plead guilty to price-fixing charges related to a conspiracy spanning 1998 to 2002, paying hundreds of millions in fines.

That precedent could be exactly what plaintiffs are banking on. No trial date has yet been scheduled, but the pressure on these companies is certainly mounting.

- Advertisement -
Sonu Banerjee
Sonu Banerjeehttp://www.talkesport.com
Fervent gamer who's either attempting (and failing) to master competitive shooters, or savoring co-op RPGs with friends. When flying solo, Sonu can be found replaying Halo for the ‘I’ve lost track’th time or grinding the newest roguelike title on Steam. Beyond the gaming realm, he enjoys binging on sitcoms, watching offbeat movies, and reading.

Popular Articles