MOUZ has officially announced a full withdrawal from Valorant, ending a three‑year run in Riot’s tactical shooter. The organization confirmed that it will no longer field a Valorant roster and is stepping away from the ecosystem entirely.
In its statement, MOUZ made it clear this wasn’t about short‑term results or a single roster, but about structural concerns. The club said the current VCT format “does not align” with its ambitions and that it “does not see a place” for itself in the existing ecosystem.
“No clear, sustainable path forward” in the current VCT structure
The core of MOUZ’s decision is the way Valorant’s ecosystem is built around a limited partner‑team structure. With only a small number of partner slots at the top and heavily gated access to international events, non‑partner organizations face a long, uncertain grind with limited upside.
MOUZ described this reality as a lack of a “clear, sustainable path forward.” In other words, even with good performances at the regional level, the organization didn’t see a realistic route to long‑term stability, visibility, and revenue inside the current VCT model. That’s a sharp message from a well‑known European brand, and one that echoes concerns other tier‑two orgs have voiced over the past two seasons.
Strong regional results, but no international breakthrough
On paper, MOUZ’s Valorant division did what a lot of tier‑two fans would expect from a serious, well‑run esports brand. The team focused on European Challengers, especially the DACH region, and stacked up genuinely strong regional results.
Highlights include:
- 1st place – Valorant Challengers 2024 DACH: Evolution – Split 2
- 1st place – Valorant Challengers 2025 DACH: Evolution – Split 3
Despite those wins, MOUZ never managed to qualify for a Masters or Champions event. Without those international appearances, it became harder to justify staying in the ecosystem: there were few sponsor‑facing moments on the global stage, no guaranteed pathway into the partner league, and constant uncertainty about the future.
Part of a bigger problem for tier‑two Valorant
MOUZ’s exit isn’t happening in a vacuum. Over the last two years, multiple non‑partner organizations have either scaled back or fully exited Valorant, and many of them point to similar issues:
- A closed or semi‑closed partner model with very limited promotion routes
- Lack of long‑term security for Challengers‑level teams
- Difficult planning horizons for salaries, infrastructure, and scouting
- An ecosystem where strong regional results don’t always translate into sustainable growth
When an established European name like MOUZ leaves despite winning multiple regional splits, it highlights a structural imbalance. Tier‑two teams are doing what the system asks—developing talent, winning local leagues—but still don’t see a realistic way to turn that into stable, multi‑year participation at the highest level.
What this means for Valorant fans and the scene
For Valorant fans, MOUZ’s departure is a reminder that the health of the scene isn’t just about partner teams and global events. Challengers and regional ecosystems are where new players, coaches, and stories are built, and losing recognizable brands at that level thins out the competitive field.
It also increases pressure on Riot to address long‑standing concerns around promotion, revenue opportunities, and visibility for non‑partner organizations. If more tier‑two orgs follow MOUZ out of the door, the gap between the partner league and the rest of the ecosystem will only widen.
For now, MOUZ bows out with a clear message: strong regional results are not enough if the broader structure doesn’t offer a believable, sustainable future. How Riot responds to that signal over the next VCT cycle will say a lot about where Valorant esports is heading beyond its current partner era.